How does Quidditch make no sense?

One of the other rules of Quidditch that doesn’t make any sense is the fact that games can go on indefinitely. There is no time limit to the game. The match only ends when the Snitch is caught. It would make a lot more sense if there was a cap such as that the game couldn’t go longer than five hours or so.

Do Quidditch rules make sense?

Rowling, however, says the scoring system makes total sense. “There’s glamour in chasing an elusive lucky break, but teamwork and persistence can still win the day,” Rowling writes on Twitter. “Everyone’s vulnerable to blows of fate and obstructive people, and success means rising above them.

Can Quidditch end without catching the snitch?

Technically you could win a match even if your team doesn’t catch the Snitch. Since Quidditch is a point-based game the only thing you need to do is score enough goals to secure more points than the other team will have after the points for catching the Snitch are added up.

Is Quidditch broken?

Absolutely. It is obviously, absurdly broken… so broken, in fact, that Rowling had to try and explain it as a metaphor. It makes total sense. There’s glamour in chasing an elusive lucky break, but teamwork and persistence can still win the day.

Why are there no substitutes in Quidditch?

In the case of injury, no substitution of players will take place. The team will play on without the injured player. This is why Krum and Lynch were turning themselves into human mince pies without calling a substitute. Poor Lynch in particular had to stay on the pitch to keep Krum from the Snitch, no matter the cost.

Does the snitch have to be caught to end the game?

Catching the all-important Snitch ends the game. But if your team is down more than 150 points, you have no incentive to catch the Snitch. Plus, the seeker seems to be more important than just about anybody else on the field of play.

Is the Golden Snitch caught in every game?

What happens if you don’t catch the Snitch?

To do that, you can rack up goals worth 10 points each, or your designated seeker can catch an elusive winged ball called the Snitch to earn a whopping 150 points. Catching the all-important Snitch ends the game. But if your team is down more than 150 points, you have no incentive to catch the Snitch.

What happens if the seeker doesn’t catch the Snitch?

Originally Answered: What happens when a player other than the seeker catches the snitch? If a player other than the Seeker catches the Snitch, it results in a foul known as ‘Snitchnip”. That player’s team is then automatically disqualified. An example of this happened during the 2014 Quidditch World Cup.

Why does the golden snitch exist?

The Golden Snitch was originally not a ball, but a little magical bird called a Golden Snidget. It was introduced in 1269, when the Chief of the Wizards’ Council, Barberus Bragge, unleashed a Golden Snidget during a Quidditch match, offering a reward of 150 Galleons to the player who caught the Snidget.

Is the scoring system of Quidditch makes no sense?

Q. The scoring system of Quidditch makes no sense. J.K. Rowling: It makes total sense. There’s glamour in chasing an elusive lucky break, but teamwork and persistence can still win the day. Everyone’s vulnerable to blows of fate and obstructive people, and success means rising above them.

Why does J K Rowling think Quidditch makes sense?

The scoring system of Quidditch makes no sense. J.K. Rowling: It makes total sense. There’s glamour in chasing an elusive lucky break, but teamwork and persistence can still win the day. Everyone’s vulnerable to blows of fate and obstructive people, and success means rising above them.

Is the game of quidditch an inherently flawed sport?

If something like that were done, Quidditch would end up looking something like basketball crossed with rugby, and would be an essentially normal sport. Though it’s true that Quidditch seems flawed, that may be the wrong question to ask. The real question is: does the unreasonable structure of the game make it a flaw in the world of the books?

When to stop looking for the Snitch in Quidditch?

But even if a team is down by 150 points or more, it’s logical that their seeker should then stop looking for the snitch. If they catch it, the game ends as a loss for their team. Either way, only the seeker and the snitch matter.